A giant leap, perhaps

Jonathan Kay at The National Post of Canada did a very brave thing, for a journalist in today's avoid-the-facts-at-all-costs climate -- he admitted there might be more to 9/11 skepticism than a bunch of nut jobs.

Mind you, I'm not willing to state that the American government, Baron Rothschild, aliens or whomever masterminded 9/11. But there are far, FAR too many inconsistencies than the 9/11 Commission and Popular Mechanics are able to answer away.

Like this one: Building 7 at the World Trade Center complex only had a couple of fires burning here and there. Why was the building -- to use the demolition-trade expression -- "pulled?" (i.e., demolished) And why did WTC owner Larry Silverstein admit it was "pulled?"

It takes WEEKS for a building to be prepared to be demolished. How did it happen so quickly?

And believe me -- that's just ONE inconsistency. There are hundreds. I simply want answers.

I applaud Jonathan Kay for keeping an open mind. Not easy nowadays, especially for journalists.